Like millions of others, I have a Twitter account. My Twitter account is @DawkinsDog because, well, I liked the idea of being Richard's dog who sneaks online to comment about evolution, religion and creationists. One of the joys of this is that I sometimes, though not often, encounter religious Tweeters who respond to my comments. One such is @ImH0me, who recently sent me the following comments, which sadly a 140 character reply (the normal Twitter limit) cannot do justice to. So, I shall comment here☺
I'll start with a few of their tweets to me.
scientific exploration and endeavour and, so far, it's not been shown wrong, however many 'creation scientists' have been thrown at it! Oh, and again, we didn't come from f**king stones!
“He just pretends 2know 2b blameless” I'm not even sure what this means. Richard Dawkins doesn't pretend to know anything, he can back up what he says with scientific evidence – evidence that anybody would be welcome to disprove and could likely win a Nobel Prize if they were able. As to blameless, how so? Blameless of what exactly?