Once again, we risk our sanity to touch on the ramblings of Heidi Carico. This time she has responded to a thread that hadn't seen use since the 3rd December last year.
I'll go straight into her first post. The level of bigotry and ignorance jumps off the screen with this one!
Atheists are ignorant as they show and are proud of. They don't know what marriage is, they don't know that a pregnant woman is carrying another human life inside of her, they don't know whther a wife and mother are women or men, nor why animals can't breed human descendants. They don't even know who the "common ancestors" are in their story! lol. So thy don't know the origin of man or life. They don't know what happened in any given year in pre-history, they don't know Jewish history or the difference between right and wrong, good and evil, they don't know what sin is, thy don't know who God is, they know absolutely nothing...poor souls. But since they're proud of their ignorance, they'll just go on speaking from ignorance just to end up in hell. But that's their preference so God will gie them their wish.:)
We'll have to take this bit by bit, just for shits n' giggles.
Atheists don't know what marriage is.
Really? Well that is NOT what the US census tells us. Figures show that atheists have a significantly lowest percentage of divorces!
Atheists don't know that a pregnant woman is carrying another human life inside of her?
Bullshit, we're well aware of what is growing inside a pregnant woman and any claim we don't is obviously absolute ignorance on the part of a viciously deluded woman. What she's actually getting at is that atheists don't condemn women in the name of God when they choose to seek an abortion. However, statistics appear to show she is even wrong on this assumption and that theists are more likely to seek an abortion.
nor why animals can't breed human descendants.
Sorry, but is this woman for real? There is a reason why animals can't breed human descendants, it's because evolution doesn't fecking work like that! If she is seriously claiming this is what evolution means then she needs psychiatric help, the type administered using electrodes and very high voltages.
They don't even know who the "common ancestors" are in their story! lol. So thy don't know the origin of man or life.
We don't know our common ancestors in our 'story'? Clearly Heidi doesn't understand what the very term of common ancestor means, it does not mean a specific individual. With regards the origins of life, that isn't evolution, that is abiogenesis and even there science is making great advances. Again she's speaking out of her arse, as usual.
They don't know what happened in any given year in pre-history, they don't know Jewish history or the difference between right and wrong, good and evil, they don't know what sin is
Well, in pre-history we can't know what happened in any given year because it's pre-history, there's a clue in the term! We can, however, tell the climate in a given year going back many thousands of years thanks to deep core ice samples, dendrochronology and so on. The irony of her vitriol is that she cannot tell us what Jesus did in any particular year for much of his entire life, yet she believes the Bible without question. We have no concrete evidence that Jesus ever lived for that matter!
We don't know right from wrong, good from evil or what sin is? This is a bit rich coming from somebody who takes glee in condemning atheists to eternal hellfire in the name of her loving and merciful god. If anybody is bad and evil, it is Heidi Carico. Atheists are just as moral as theists, if not more so because we do not feel the need to take our moral guidance from an antiquated book of fables.
In fact, if we look at the figures for the US, we find that religiosity is actually higher amongst prison inmates than atheism is, significantly. Whilst we can't preclude that some claim to be theistic for some reason, the difference between the numbers would appear to indicate that the religious are still far more likely to commit crime. So much for knowing right from wrong huh?
But since they're proud of their ignorance, they'll just go on speaking from ignorance just to end up in hell. But that's their preference so God will gie them their wish.:)
I'm not proud of my ignorance because I do not consider myself to be such. She then goes on to state as a fact that her God, who is loving and merciful remember, will burn us in hell. Such a lovely God she worships, isn't it?
That was the first post, she wasn't finished, she continued to spew forth as follows.
But of course, that's why all atheists can do is slander others because they have no knowledge of anything. lol. So they act like 6 year olds, except thay even most six year olds know the difference between humans and animals which they can spot on sight.:) 6 yr. olds also know that a pregnant woman is carrying another human life inside of her. So atheists act more like 4 year olds, except even 4 year olds are teachable so they can learn much faster than atheists.:) So 2 year olds fit atheists better because 2 year olds throw tantrums when they're told they are subect to a higher authority.:)
Again, let us pick this apart.
But of course, that's why all atheists can do is slander others because they have no knowledge of anything
Heidi Carico begins this little tirade by handing to us on a plate the evidence she is ignorant not only of atheists, evolution, astronomy, astrophysics and virtually every subject, she is also ignorant of the English language. It is impossible to slander somebody online using text. Slander is when it is spoken. Were I to say Heidi Carico likes to be bent over the kitchen table and sodomized with a cucumber whilst wearing a ballgag and latex basque, that would be libel not slander – and please note I am not saying she does any of that, it is used only as an example. Apologies to anybody emotionally scared by the previous imagery.
So they act like 6 year olds, except thay even most six year olds know the difference between humans and animals which they can spot on sight.So they act like 6 year olds, except thay even most six year olds know the difference between humans and animals which they can spot on sight.
Most atheists know the difference between humans and animals, too, because basically there is none. Humans are Homo Sapiens and classified as a member of the Great Ape family and, therefore, are ourselves animals. It is only the anthropocentric desire of Heidi and her ilk to consider themselves 'special' that stops them accepting the fact that all life on this planet is related.
6 yr. olds also know that a pregnant woman is carrying another human life inside of her.
This is just a repeat of the previous ignorant bigotry she treated us to so, moving along …
So atheists act more like 4 year olds, except even 4 year olds are teachable so they can learn much faster than atheists.
She gets worse. This is a woman who is credited with saying the following:
Sorry, but I thought you considered yourself knowledge about science. Every particle of matter when observed under a microscope is composed of living micro-organisms, Ergaster.
"Homo sapiens" is a made-up creature based on skulls with missing pieces. Even criminals can't be convicted on such flimsy evidence. [rolleyes smiley]
The earth's atmosphere also just happens to contain magnetic particles to produce gravity to keep the earth's inhabitants from floating away.
No. The bible never mentions dinosaurs so they are also figments of the imaginations of scientists...
No. That's because they are the creation of 19th century science fiction writers.
DNA is all a scam.
They say that DNA from blood samples can prove who people are, but blood doesn't even HAVE DNA!
All of these nuggets of insanity can be found here: http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Carico
Heidi Carico has the fecking nerve to say atheists act like 4 year olds? Even 4 year olds know dinosaurs were real! Read the quotes above again. This is a woman who is accusing atheists of being stupid and knowing nothing, of being slow to learn. She is a grown adult and she doesn't believe dinosaurs existed because the Bible doesn't explicitly mention them!?
She ends with;
So 2 year olds fit atheists better because 2 year olds throw tantrums when they're told they are subect to a higher authority
Atheists don't throw tantrums, well not all of us, but they have every right to answer back when accused of the things Heidi thinks us guilty and we have every right to attack back when our intelligence is insulted by a woman so devoid of intelligence she denies DNA exists and gravity is magnetic particles in the atmosphere!
This bullshit about higher authority is a joke. Atheists are subect (sic) to higher authorities, just not that of imaginary sky daddies who have been said to demand wholesale slaughter, the murder of innocent babies, the murder of children for answering their parents back, the condoning of slavery and so on. To worship such a god is tantamount to collaborating with a warcriminal tyrant because doing so will get you a nice reward when you die, as I have discussed before. She is, in my mind, nothing but a gibbering coward with severe mental difficulties.
In conclusion, Heidi Carico is one of the most repulsive, vicious, venomous, ignorant and arrogant people on this planet. I pity anybody who has to come into daily contact with this vile specimen. To my mind, what she does is nothing less than hate speech and should be condemned as such. In a way I wish I did believe in god because doing so would give me the knowledge that any just god would throw her into the deep end of the boiling pits of fire where she could think for eternity on the evil and harm she has spread through her life on this Earth.
Since writing the above entry, I have become aware of an excellent article which helps dispel this ridiculous belief that Heidi Carico and her kind have about atheists. This article explains how in studies atheists can be found to enjoy lower criminality, lower divorce rates and, in a Canadian study, lower domestic violence and are less likely to exhibit racist, nationalistic and other generally negative behavioral traits. It is well worth reading.